EVE Search - New Dev Blog: Sic Itur Ad Astra - Building a New Bridge to the Stars

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

New Dev Blog: Sic Itur Ad Astra - Building a New Bridge to the Stars

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 47 post(s)
Pattern Clarc	Posted - 2009.01.26 13:42:00 - [1] 8/10 on the blog guys... I was hoping for more info on how they'll be introduced but I guess I can wait. :D ____ My Blog Is Awesome
Pattern Clarc	Posted - 2009.01.26 13:45:00 - [2] question Do you need probes to find the exit wormhole? I can imagine a group of people, leaving one behind without probes to be infinitely stuck in that worm hole space with no hope of return. And what happened to random system entrance points?? ____ My Blog Is Awesome
Pattern Clarc	Posted - 2009.01.26 15:43:00 - [3] I hope your not adding a bunch of t1 mins (no matter how valuble) that can be mined in this region - just look at what the drone regions did to low sec ore prices.. ____ My Blog Is Awesome
Pattern Clarc	Posted - 2009.01.26 16:26:00 - [4] Don't **** up this new space with crappy sov mechanics and anchorable structures please.
Pattern Clarc	Posted - 2009.01.26 16:28:00 - [5] And would it be possible to use your ship scanner to find a worm whole out say, after 1 hour of scanning? Might save yourselves a few thousand petitions a week. ____ My Blog Is Awesome
Pattern Clarc	Posted - 2009.01.26 16:46:00 - [6] Originally by: maarud Originally by: Pattern Clarc Don't **** up this new space with crappy sov mechanics and anchorable structures please. Doesn't sound like there is going to be sov, but sounds like you can put towers up. I was refering to the ghetto sov post
Pattern Clarc	Posted - 2009.01.27 12:56:00 - [7] From information provided to us from within this page, SHC have deduced that the upper limit for wormhole Mass-Stability would be roughly the mass of one Mothership. Mass-stability of wormholes of this magnitude would probably be extremely rare and more common from wormholes that lead out from 0.0. If the mass-stability of a wormhole equalled that of 1 Aeon, here are the numbers for the ships that can be transported before the wormhole collapses. Geddon = 11(.7) Harbinger = 91(.6) Sac = 100(.7) Crusader = 1178(.6) Remember, these numbers are pure speculation and have been deduced purely on comments made by the CCP since the recent blog
Pattern Clarc	Posted - 2009.01.27 14:56:00 - [8] Ok New question to greyscale Do wormholes work like gates? With similar aggression mechanics?? If i'm warpscambled can I still jump through? How big is the jump zone etc? And how does that square with RP and lore? Or.. should I just wait and see? And if so, when will we be able to play with this on Sisi?
Pattern Clarc	Posted - 2009.01.27 16:09:00 - [9] Originally by: Mistral Sud Edited by: Mistral Sud on 27/01/2009 16:00:13 Originally by: CCP Greyscale We've got a cutoff value (12,000,000kg currently) which is a minimum ship mass that can always use a wormhole while its mass budget is still above 0kg. If this ship takes the budget below 0kg, it collapses. Say then you've got a wormhole with 9,900,000kg left: you can jump a 11,000,000kg cruiser through, but that'll take it below 0 and it collapses behind you. You could also take 10 1,000,000kg frigates through, and it'd collapse after the last one. Does that mean i can always take a titan through a wormhole for a one way ride? srry i got it didnt understand the cutoff thingy :P Cruiser would be the biggest ship able to go through when the mass left is still above 0kg but smaller than most ship sizes. ____ My Blog Is Awesome
Pattern Clarc	Posted - 2009.01.27 17:41:00 - [10] It would be very prudent if all the resources available in w-space was completely new - and created t3 (or beyond) and didn't interfere with existing markets (t1 and t2) unless you wanted a general price crash.... Otherwise, if mineral generation was from salvaging alone, I don't see t3 components coming anywhere near t2 - and that as severe balance implications if your intending t3 to be equal to, t2 in terms of barriers to entry and capabilities. ____ My Blog Is Awesome
Pattern Clarc	Posted - 2009.01.27 20:04:00 - [11] Originally by: Zoiewu Edited by: Zoiewu on 27/01/2009 19:31:53 Originally by: Serenity Steele Nice. However No-Sov = Crap. It would be a hellava lot more interesting with Sov and jump bridges. Stop making all solar systems in EVE a Commodity FFS. It's actually interesting to have something to fight over and for! I hope you missed the sarcasm tag. QFT

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.